Jets’ free agency plan: Pros and cons
-
- March
- 3
With the two biggest names – linebacker Adalius Thomas and cornerback Nate Clements – off the board, the first-ever Jets Journal poll is officially closed.
Just a reminder to all you frustrated Jets fans, the overwhelming majority voted that the Jets should essentially save their money to re-sign their own, like Jerricho Cotchery, and point toward the draft. Hope everybody had fun with the poll, I’ll post another one shortly.
The final numbers:
Concentrate on own players/draft – 58 percent
Thomas – 28 percent
Clements – 14 percent
Turner/Rhodes – 0 percent
Two thoughts: Man, would Adalius Thomas have looked good in green. And, man, was a lot of money spent on Clements ($80 million, $22 guaranteed by the 49ers) and Thomas ($60 million, about $15 million guaranteed by the Patriots).
Of course, the fact that Thomas goes to the Patriots (who also got ex-Jet tight end Kyle Brady) is a double whammy for the Jets.
Meanwhile, loyal reader Harlan gave voice to all frustrated Jets fans with a comment in an earlier post. I’ll repeat (most of it) here in case anybody missed it.
Harlan writes, “I am extremely frustrated with our team’s response to FA. There were two players in FA available who could have immediately improved our team. Both could play more than one position. Both were good guys. Both would improve areas of need. The “gameâ€? was clear to anyone with half a brain. The top players in FA, the difference makers, were identified and gone after and signed within something like 24 (maybe 48 hours).
We apparently had not contacted either of the two players, A. Thomas and Eric Steinbach, who could have most helped us before they signed. Worse, one of them went to our own division’s champion, making overtaking the Pats harder.
As I am writing this, Saturday morning, the Pats have signed A. Thomas for about what I estimated he would cost. They also replaced Graham with a better blocker in Kyle Brady for a two-year cheap deal. The Pats and the Bills approached FA correctly. They had done their homework and moved quickly immediately strengthening their team from the best available free players (i.e., no draft picks or trades required).
The Bills signings were less dramatic and none we needed to make. However, getting two offensive line starters and a TE means better blocking for Losman and a stronger running game. Solid moves by another division rival.
All our cap room has been wasted by a slow moving FO. What are we going to spend it on? Our stiff Clements? Rhodes who has two years left on his deal? If we sign a Duckett or Brown who is going to block for them? An aging Kendall and inept Clements and Moore? Does anyone think these two JAGs (or an aging self centered Dillon) is better than the top three RB in the draft (or even in the same league with these rooks)? If we had taken care of our pass rush and OL in FA, we could afford to go RB in the draft.’’
Anyway, those are Harlan’s thoughts. Personally, I didn’t like the Eric Steinbach signing and, besides, the Jets weren’t likely to consider him anyway because of his past baggage.
I think what you take out of the Jets’ battle plan through these first hours of free agency is that: A) GM Mike Tannenbaum/coach Eric Mangini had a plan, regardless of whether you agree with it or not, B) They’re sticking to it regardless of whether you like it or not and, C)At the very least, Tannenbaum had the decency to be honest about it before free agency opened.



Jane McManus 







The Bills gave ridiculous money to a guard, and lost a top flight CB. That’s some FA plan – one the Jets are wise not to follow.
Seeing Thomas go to the Pats – that one is harder to take. Regarding your poll, it was a little limiting – I voted to get Thomas, but also applaud the extension of Cotchery. Depending on the structuring of Cotchery’s contract, these were not mutually exclusive moves.
Dont forget the Bills let Fletcher walk too. They are a worse teamt today then yesterday, and will not spend real money, not a long term threat to Jets.
However, the Pats certainly have figured out this football thing, havent they?
I think Harlon was way too harsh in his assesment of our front office, especially after all of last years success. While I would have loved to get players like Adalius Thomas and Nate Clements it’s just not realistic to go out there and throw crazy money at these guys. Sit back Jets fans, relax and let Mangini and Tannenbaum build this team the right way. Think about all the big free agent signings in the past, how many of those deals have actually worked out.
Plus Adalius Thomas is 29 and I believe he will be 30 before the year starts, how many more productive years are left in a LB who relies on his speed and athleticism.
[...] Original post by Andrew Gross and plugin by Elliott Back [...]
Ferragmo; too harsh? Thirty seven years of futility will do that to a fan.
I agree that Thomas likely only has three great years left. I had factored that into my assessment. So did the Pats.
If you look at both Steinbach’s and Thomas’ deals, they could be construed as three year commitments for between $7 and $7.5 mil or so (assuming the initial reports are accurate). A three year fix for our LB core or OL seems reasonable to me and would give Tangini three years to fill other holes and build depth through the draft, undrafted FA, and bit player FA who they develop while the cap going up for each of those years might make the contracts seem more reasonable.
BTW, what is the source of your screen name. Mine is just my name.
harlan
[...] Original post by Andrew Gross and powered by Img Fly [...]
It does suck that the Patriots picked up Thomas, but at least they had to sink some big bucks into him. I don’t think you can ever justify going after a player just to keep him off another teams roster, unless your incentive is simply to drive the price up on your rival. I trust this staff to do what’s right for the Jets at the end of the day.
Sometimes teams tell you it’s philosophy when in reality its greed. Ticket prices up, TV package up, Jet spending down.