<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trying harder at No. 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jets.lohudblogs.com/2006/10/06/trying-harder-at-no-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jets.lohudblogs.com/2006/10/06/trying-harder-at-no-2/</link>
	<description>Jane McManus of The Journal News on the Jets.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:51:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Gross</title>
		<link>http://jets.lohudblogs.com/2006/10/06/trying-harder-at-no-2/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Gross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 17:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jets.lohudblogs.com/2006/10/06/trying-harder-at-no-2/#comment-131</guid>
		<description>The trade deadline is Oct. 17 at 4 p.m., the same day players are eligible to come offf the physically-unable-to-perform list. However, I&#039;d be surprised if either Ramsey or Robertson are traded in the middle of the season, though player-for-player deals are becoming more common in the NFL. There are cap considerations for both players and, on top of that, I think the Jets want to stick with a more experienced backup. I don&#039;t discount deals for either in the off-season.

And, yes, Robertson seems far better suited to a 4-3 team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The trade deadline is Oct. 17 at 4 p.m., the same day players are eligible to come offf the physically-unable-to-perform list. However, I&#8217;d be surprised if either Ramsey or Robertson are traded in the middle of the season, though player-for-player deals are becoming more common in the NFL. There are cap considerations for both players and, on top of that, I think the Jets want to stick with a more experienced backup. I don&#8217;t discount deals for either in the off-season.</p>
<p>And, yes, Robertson seems far better suited to a 4-3 team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://jets.lohudblogs.com/2006/10/06/trying-harder-at-no-2/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 13:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jets.lohudblogs.com/2006/10/06/trying-harder-at-no-2/#comment-130</guid>
		<description>When is the trading deadline? Would seem that once Clemens is deemed ready to be the number two, Ramsey could very well be marketed to a team desperate for a QB (Tampa, KC?).

Also would not surprise me to see them unload Robertson to a 4-3 team (again KC?).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When is the trading deadline? Would seem that once Clemens is deemed ready to be the number two, Ramsey could very well be marketed to a team desperate for a QB (Tampa, KC?).</p>
<p>Also would not surprise me to see them unload Robertson to a 4-3 team (again KC?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny</title>
		<link>http://jets.lohudblogs.com/2006/10/06/trying-harder-at-no-2/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 02:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jets.lohudblogs.com/2006/10/06/trying-harder-at-no-2/#comment-129</guid>
		<description>The QB question has been pretty much relegated to the back burner since Chad&#039;s somewhat surprising return to form.  Consequently, it has not been such a hot issue in our NG from the day that he was officially installed as the starter.  It&#039;s good to know that Em has not let it slip his mind though.  It&#039;s what one would expect from a smart, well organized HC.  I&#039;m so glad we&#039;ve got him.

Thanks for keeping us posted on this saituation, Andrew.  We all know that it&#039;s just one bad hit away from once again becoming everyone&#039;s Topic One.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The QB question has been pretty much relegated to the back burner since Chad&#8217;s somewhat surprising return to form.  Consequently, it has not been such a hot issue in our NG from the day that he was officially installed as the starter.  It&#8217;s good to know that Em has not let it slip his mind though.  It&#8217;s what one would expect from a smart, well organized HC.  I&#8217;m so glad we&#8217;ve got him.</p>
<p>Thanks for keeping us posted on this saituation, Andrew.  We all know that it&#8217;s just one bad hit away from once again becoming everyone&#8217;s Topic One.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
